72 MARCH 2026 • WORLD AQUACULTURE • WWW.WAS.ORG technologically demanding, requiring specialized expertise in nutrition, genetics, and health. Projects that simply assume seed will always be available soon face shortages. Genetic improvement programs are expensive, but essential for long-term performance. Technology requirements to produce seed/juveniles usually make small-scale farmers dependent on third parties for their supply, a fact that combined with reliance on intermediaries in their sales of end products, makes small-scale aquaculture inherently risky and less profitable. Environmental and Stakeholder Pressures. Finally, aquaculture must secure social and political acceptance. Projects perceived as polluting, unsustainable, or exclusive may face opposition from communities, government agencies, and NGOs. Even technically sound projects can fail without social license. Additionally, norms and regulations that promote development need political support, which may not be readily available if community approval is limited or non-existent. Climate change adds further stress. Rising temperatures, algal blooms, and hypoxia events are increasingly common. Ignoring carrying capacity or ecological impacts not only risks individual ventures but undermines the credibility of the entire sector. From Risk to Resilience: Frameworks and Tools These 10 causes of failure can be reframed for success. They form a practical checklist that investors and operators can use to diagnose weaknesses and guide planning. Risks can be identified and quantified. High-probability, high-impact risks demand special attention and mitigation. Low-probability, low-impact risks can be monitored but need less investment. Thus, in all, aquaculture projects face a complex blend of risks that span from biology, technology, the environment, management, finance, and marketing to governance. Managing these risks in a structured and systematic way is essential if aquaculture ventures are to achieve long-term success. The success of an aquaculture venture also depends on strength across the four fundamental pillars of animal production: feed, genetics, health, and management. These elements are interdependent and weakness in one inevitably undermines the others. High-quality feed cannot offset poor genetics, and even the best genetics are wasted without sound management and robust health practices. True resilience comes only when all four pillars, and a competitive position in globalized markets, are developed in balance with sustainability. Toward Sustainable and Resilient Aquaculture Resilience is not only about profits. It requires environmental sustainability and social and political licenses. Sustainability emphasizes predictable profits while respecting carrying capacity, using traceable inputs, reducing carbon footprint and building community trust. These principles are increasingly demanded by regulators and rewarded by markets. Successful projects treat sustainability not as a burden but as an investment in resilience. They recognize that public and political perception are as important as technical performance. Projects that build trust with communities and demonstrate transparency are more likely to survive shocks and secure long-term markets. Conclusion Aquaculture is generally high risk, but prospect of failure can certainly be reduced if not avoided. The 10 recurring causes of collapse we have outlined are predictable and the risks manageable with discipline, planning, and humility. By aligning ownership, grounding business plans in reality, defining clear market options, investing in people, maintaining financial discipline, respecting biosecurity and embracing sustainability, ventures can move from fragility to resilience, particularly if they are proven viable with demonstration facilities aimed at reducing perceived risks in the case of innovative or locally unknown technologies, processes or new species. The future of aquaculture depends not only on expanding production but on de-risking it. Projects that succeed will be those that anticipate risks, integrate lessons from past failures and build enterprises capable of surviving shocks and thriving over time. Notes Lorenzo M. Juárez,* International Center for Strategic Studies in Aquaculture (CIDEEA), 13314 Fawn Lilly Dr. Riverview, FL 33579 USA; Juan-Pablo Lazo, Center for Scientific Research and Higher Education of Ensenada, CICESE, Ensenada, B.C., México; Antonio Garza de Yta, International Center for Strategic Studies in Aquaculture (CIDEEA), México City, Mexico; Trond Bjorndal, SNF Centre for Applied Research at NHH, Bergen, Norway; Carlos Wurmann, International Center for Strategic Studies in Aquaculture (CIDEEA), Santiago, Chile; and Humberto Villarreal, CIBNOR, La Paz, México, who co-authors this article posthumously. The other co-authors dedicate it to his memory. * Corresponding author: lorenzojuarez@yahoo.com Aquaculture is generally high risk, but prospect of failure can certainly be reduced if not avoided. The 10 recurring causes of collapse we have outlined are predictable and the risks manageable with discipline, planning, and humility. By aligning ownership, grounding business plans in reality, defining clear market options, investing in people, maintaining financial discipline, respecting biosecurity and embracing sustainability, ventures can move from fragility to resilience, particularly if they are proven viable with demonstration facilities aimed at reducing perceived risks in the case of innovative or locally unknown technologies, processes or new species. The future of aquaculture depends not only on expanding production but on de-risking it. Projects that succeed will be those that anticipate risks, integrate lessons from past failures and build enterprises capable of surviving shocks and thriving over time.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjExNDY=