Aquaculture America 2026

February 16 - 19, 2026

Las Vegas, Nevada

Add To Calendar 18/02/2026 15:00:0018/02/2026 15:20:00America/Los_AngelesAquaculture America 2026COPPER SULFATE TREATMENT HARMS ZOOPLANKTON AND ULTIMATELY PROMOTES ALGAL BLOOMS: A FIELD MESOCOSM EXPERIMENTConcorde AThe World Aquaculture Societyjohnc@was.orgfalseDD/MM/YYYYanrl65yqlzh3g1q0dme13067

COPPER SULFATE TREATMENT HARMS ZOOPLANKTON AND ULTIMATELY PROMOTES ALGAL BLOOMS: A FIELD MESOCOSM EXPERIMENT

Alan E. Wilson*, Saranya Anantapantula, Susanne Wittenzeller, Matthew F. Gladfelter, Suzanne E. Tenison, Hannah Zinnert, and Angelea P. Belfiore

 

Auburn University

School of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences

Auburn, Alabama, USA

wilson@auburn.edu

 



Excess nutrient loading often promotes harmful algal blooms. Despite many past studies, few algal bloom control methods show clear, long-term improvements in water quality. For example, chemical treatments are often used to control algal blooms because they can cause large, rapid declines in algal abundance. However, these effects are often transient requiring future treatments that increase costs and risks to water quality. Moreover, empirical tests of repeated applications or combinations of different treatments are rare, even with their common use across industries, like aquaculture and drinking water. To rigorously test the effects of single or combined treatments on water quality in a eutrophic aquaculture pond, copper sulfate pentahydrate (henceforth called copper) and Phoslock were used independently (full dose) or combined (each at half dose) in a 56-day field experiment conducted in a hypereutrophic aquaculture pond. The two copper-containing treatments caused rapid declines (-83%) in algal abundance the day after treatment followed by very large (2,617%) increases after another five days (panel a).  Cyanobacteria were quickly reduced after copper treatment but returned where copper was applied (panel b). Zooplankton were reduced by 43% in the copper treatment but minimally affected (+1%) by the combined treatment the day after application (panel c). To further show that copper treatment is the mechanism responsible for the negative effects on zooplankton and phytoplankton, half of the mesocosms for all four treatments were treated with a full dose of copper on day 13 and similar effects on phytoplankton were observed as when copper was initially applied. The combined treatment was more effective at controlling phytoplankton than the copper only treatment, in part, because of lesser negative effects on zooplankton. Overall, this experiment further highlights the long-term, negative effects that chemical treatments, like copper, have on non-target taxa, such as beneficial zooplankton, which limits their potential for ecological and sustainable control of harmful algal blooms.