Aquaculture America 2026

February 16 - 19, 2026

Las Vegas, Nevada

Add To Calendar 17/02/2026 16:00:0017/02/2026 16:20:00America/Los_AngelesAquaculture America 2026ENHANCING HYBRID CATFISH PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY THROUGH XENOGENIC WHITE CATFISH Ameiurus catus SURROGACYConcorde BThe World Aquaculture Societyjohnc@was.orgfalseDD/MM/YYYYanrl65yqlzh3g1q0dme13067

ENHANCING HYBRID CATFISH PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY THROUGH XENOGENIC WHITE CATFISH Ameiurus catus SURROGACY

Darshika Udari Hettiarachchi*, Kate B. Pottle, Baofeng Su, Mei Shang, David Baker, Kailyn Shealy, Kieran Stein, Brendan Leibert, Ahmed Shaaban, Misha Soman, Dhanuka Bambaranda, Nadeen Abdo, Teresa David, Homnath Dhakal, Ian A.E. Butts, Rex A. Dunham

School of Fisheries, Aquaculture and Aquatic Sciences

Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, 36849

duh0001@auburn.edu

 



The production of donor derived gametes through xenogenesis is an emerging biotechnology for producing hybrid catfish (channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus ♀ × blue catfish, I. furcatus ♂) embryos. In this study, the reproductive success of xenogenic white catfish (Ameiurus catus) transplanted with donor germline stem cells from blue and channel catfish was evaluated following transplantation at different days post-hatch (DPH). Pairing of xenogenic males and females was conducted according to their transplantation DPHs. Gravid females were administered intraperitoneal injections of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue to induce the spawning. Following the spawning, reproductive performance was evaluated among xenogenic, and control groups.

Donor germline stem cells transplanted between 3 to 7 DPH were capable of producing donor-derived progeny, with the highest proportion observed in recipients transplanted at 4 to 6 DPH (60.0 - 72.7%). There was no significant difference in relative fecundity between xenogenic white catfish producing channel × blue hybrid progeny (channel catfish eggs fertilized by xenogenic white catfish males) (4608.1 ± 1675.9) and control channel catfish females (4546.4 ± 1712.2; P > 0.05). However, xenogenic white catfish exhibited significantly higher relative fecundity compared to control white catfish (2619.1 ± 756.0) and xenogenic white catfish females producing blue catfish progeny (blue catfish eggs) parents (1202.4 ± 261.3; P < 0.05). Similarly, there was no significant difference in fry yield per kilogram of female broodstock between xenogenic white catfish producing channel × blue hybrid progeny (2981.8 ± 787.7) and control channel catfish producing channel catfish progeny (2882.6 ± 584.2; P > 0.05). In contrast, fry yield per kilogram of females was significantly higher in xenogenic white catfish producing channel × blue hybrid progeny compared to control white catfish (1950.4 ± 548.3) and xenogenic white catfish parents producing blue catfish progeny (780.1 ± 331.8; P < 0.05). There were no significant differences for the hatching rates (> 66.5 ± 9.4%) among four groups.

These results demonstrate the suitability of white catfish as a host species for xenogenesis when stem cells are transplanted between 4 and 6 DPH, and an alternative technology to produce hybrid progeny without sacrificing blue catfish males.  These differences in relative fecundity and ultimately fry output were a result of a major impact of the donor species on fecundity and egg size relative to that of the host species.