World Aquaculture Magazine - March 2016

60 MARCH 2016 • WORLD AQUACULTURE • WWW.WAS.ORG g and fetch approximately US$ 10/kg (Tayamen 2005). The freshwater prawn is gradually establishing a niche in local markets and also represents a multi-million dollar export opportunity to Japan, US, Taiwan and the European Union. Freshwater prawn is a high-value species that represents an alternative to black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon and whiteleg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Farmed freshwater prawns on average weigh from 30-100 g, which about the same size as medium to jumbo black tiger shrimp. Infectious Diseases in Freshwater Prawn Culture With the steady increase of global and local shrimp market prices in recent years, shrimp aquaculture has been converting from extensive and semi-intensive farming to super-intensive systems. This change in farming system can cause serious problems with infectious diseases because cultured shrimps are exposed to stressful conditions. Disease control and biosecurity are among the most critical issues that threaten the sustainability of commercial shrimp farming. Giant freshwater prawn has been cultured for over 40 years, but there is scant information on pathogens and parasites (Arthur et al. 2005). Although it is a moderately disease-resistant species compared to penaeid shrimp (Ravi et al. 2009), with the rapid development of intensive farming, microorganisms have been implicated in many serious diseases (Liang et al. 2011). The common causes of infectious diseases in giant freshwater prawn are mostly viruses and bacteria (Vibrio and Aeromonas) that impede production of seed and cause stock mortalities (Bachere 2000). Early larval stages are very susceptible to vibriosis and Aeromonas infections, which can cause complete mortality (Tonguthai 1997). The production and survival of healthy larvae and post-larvae has been a primary hindrance in the expansion of freshwater prawn aquaculture (Prakash and Karmagam 2013). Use of Immunostimulants in Shrimp Aquaculture The crustacean immune system lacks adaptive immune response mechanisms and therefore defense depends on the nonspecific immune response. The non-specific immune defense of crustaceans is primarily attributed to hemocytes, which are specialized blood cells that carry out cellular and humoral mechanisms such as phagocytosis and encapsulation, and production of antimicrobial substances to combat foreign particles and infectious agents, among others (Lio-Pio and Inui 2010). Additionally, crustaceans upregulate expression of immune-related genes in response to viruses and other pathogens. One promising technique for prophylaxis and disease control is to increase the immune status of shrimp with immunostimulants. According to Bricknell and Dalmo (2005), “An immunostimulant is a naturally occurring compound that modulates the immune system by increasing the host’s resistance against diseases that in most circumstances are caused by pathogens.” This approach enhances innate immune responses, resistance to bacterial and viral infections, resistance to pathological and environmental stresses, and growth performance in many shrimp species (Wang et al. 2013). Immunostimulants used in aquaculture provoke beneficial effects because of enhanced cellular and humoral responses in cultured species (Ringø et al. 2012). Immunostimulants influence and target non-specific immune aspects such as complement levels, lysozyme levels, natural killer activity, phagocytic cell activity, and total immunoglobulin levels, among others (Shankar et al. 2012). Different immunostimulants activate various aspects of the immune system and their efficacies are species-specific, pathogenspecific and largely depend on delivery method (Sakai 1999, Smith et al. 2003, Agrawal et al. 2010). Immunostimulants are administered by immersion, injection or through dietary inclusion (Rocha-Montero et al. 2006, Chiu et al. 2010, Wang et al. 2013). Dietary immunostimulants offer a cheap and effective method for increasing the productivity and cost-effectivness of aquaculture operations by enhancing disease resistance and stress tolerance and reducing the need for more radical and costly disease control measures. A number of substances confer immunostimulatory properties in different species of cultured shrimp. Immunostimulants include inactivated microbes and their cellular components, complex carbohydrates and polysaccharides, animal extracts, cytokines, lectins, plant and herbal extracts, vitamins, minerals and synthetic compounds. Outlook for the Future Factors that constrain development of giant freshwater prawn culture in the Phillipines include inadequate information on nutritional requirements of the prawn, the need for broodstock and seed improvement, lack of technological innovations that lower production cost and improve its growth and survival, and low extension of technology to potential farmers (Rosario and Tayamen 2004, Tayamen 2005, De Guzman 2008). Freshwater prawn aquaculture continues to face serious risks and threats of diseases, which explains in part the decrease in global production of prawns (Angeles et al. 2009, Kutty 2005). The risk and threat of disease outbreaks can be reduced with the use of dietary immunostimulants. This practice can support good production levels of freshwater prawn when disease resistance through dietary stimulation is achieved. Development of this industry can certainly translate to employment opportunities, providing prawn farmers with stable jobs and livelihoods. Notes Janice A. Ragaza, Department of Biology, School of Science and Engineering, Loyola Schools, Ateneo de Manila University, Katipunan Avenue, Loyola Heights, Quezon City 1108, Manila, Philippines. E-mail: jragaza@ateneo.edu References Agrawal, S., S. Khadase and G. Talele. 2010. Bioactive immunomodulatory fraction from Tridaxprocumbens. Asian Journal of Biological Sciences 3:120-127. Angeles, I., Y.H. Chien and M.M. Tayamen. 2009. Effects of different dosages of astaxanthin on giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii (De Man) challenged with Lactococcus garvieae. Aquaculture Research 41:70-77. Arthur, J.R., D. Hurwood, E.R. Lovell, M.G. Bondad-Reantaso and P.B. Mather. 2005. Pathogen and ecological risk analysis for the

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjExNDY=