36 SEPTEMBER 2017 • WORLD AQUACULTURE • WWW.WAS.ORG Notes Pål Myhre, Marine Design, Norway. Alberto J. P. Nunes, Labomar – Marine Science Institute, Federal University of Ceara – UFC, Brazil Felipe M. Suplicy, Centre of Aquaculture and Fisheries Development – CEDAP/EPAGRI, Brazil Erica A. G. Vidal, Centre for Marine Studies, University of Parana – UFPR, Brazil Artur N. Rombenso, Feed Aqua Nutrition Lab - Institute of Oceanography, Autonomous University of Baja California – UABC, Mexico Leila Hayashi, Centre for Agrarian Sciences, Aquaculture Department, Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC, Brazil Fernando T. Kanemoto, Nauplii Aquaculture, Brazil and João F. N. Matias, Aquaculture Network for the Americas (RAA)- FAO, Brazil. Acknowledgments For several years, SINTEF Ocean has communicated with various aquaculture academic groups in Brazil. At the same time, there has also been extensive contact with federal authorities responsible for planning and policy priorities in the sector. In 2013, SINTEF, in collaboration with NTNU and Marine Design, received funding from the Norwegian Research Council’s Latin America Program to implement the four-year project “Sustainable Aquaculture in Brazil” (SusAquaBrazil). The SusAquaBrazil project management team consists of Gunvor Øie (SINTEF Ocean, Norway), Pål Myhre (Marine Design, Norway), Kjell I. Reitan (NTNU, Department of Biology, Norway) and Roger Richardsen (SINTEF Ocean, Norway), who have also contributed to this paper. References Baldisseroto, B. 2009. Piscicultura continental no Rio Grande do Sul: situação atual, problemas e perspectivas para o futuro. Ciência Rural 39(1):291-299 (in Portuguese). Brasil, B.S.A.F., F.C.P. Silva and F.G. Siqueira. In press. Microalgae biorefineries: The Brazilian scenario in perspective. New Biotechnology. Camargo, S.G.O. and J.L.O.F. Pouey. 2005. Aquicultura: um mercado em expansão. Revista Brasileira de Agrociências 11:393396 (in Portuguese). Cavalli, R.O., A.S. Garcia, and A.N. Rombenso. In press. Exigências nutricionais e alimentação do beijupirá. In: R. Cavalli, editor. Aquicultura do beijupirá (Rachycentron canadum). Resultados dos estudos REPIMAR. Ministério de Pesca e Aquicultura - MPA/CNPQ, Brazil (in Portuguese). Chies, V. and E. Costa. 2016. Nordeste já produz cianobactérias. Spirullina cultivada na Paraíba e Ceará atende mercados de alimentação humana e animal. Agroenergia em Revista 10:50-53. https://issuu.com/embrapa/docs/agroenergiaemrevista_ed10 (in Portuguese). Collares, D. 2016. Aposta na pesquisa com microalgas. Governo Federal investe em pesquisas para biocombustíveis e bioprodutos. Agroenergia em Revista 10:4-5. https://issuu.com/embrapa/docs/ agroenergiaemrevista_ed10 (in Portuguese). Derner, R.B. 2016. A importância das microalgas na aquicultura. Aquaculture Brasil 1:62. http://www.aquaculturebrasil. com/2016/08/26/importancia-das-microalgas-na-aquicultura/ (in Portuguese). DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). 2016. National Algal Biofuels Technology Review. U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Bioenergy Technology Office. 212 p. Hayashi, L., C. Bulboa, P. Kradolfer, G. Soriano and D. Robledo. 2014. Cultivation of red seaweeds: A Latin American perspective. Journal of Applied Phycology 26:719-727 IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística). 2016. Official data for Municipal Livestock Research 2015. http://www.ibge.gov. br/home/estatistica/economia/ppm/2015/default_xls_perfil.shtm. Accessed in April 21th 2017. Jacob-Lopes, E. and T.T. Franco. 2013. From oil refinery to microalgal biorefinery. Journal of CO2 Utilization 2:1-7. Lee, P.G. 1994. Nutrition of cephalopods: fuelling the system. Marine Freshwater Behaviour Physiology 25:35-51. Leite, T.S., M. Haimovici, W. Molina and K. Warnke. 2008. Morphological and genetic description of Octopus insularis, a new cryptic species in the Octopus vulgaris Complex (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) from the tropical South-western Atlantic. Journal of Molluscan Studies 74:63-74. Lenz, T.M., N.H. Elias, T.S. Leite and E.A.G. Vidal. 2015. First description of the eggs and paralarvae of the tropical octopus, Octopus insularis, under culture conditions. American Malacological Bulletin 33(1):101-109. MDIC (Ministry of Development, Industry and Foreign Trade). 2017. Official data for importation in Brazil. http://aliceweb. mdic. gov.br//consulta-ncm/index/type/importacaoNcm. Accessed in April 21, 2017 (in Portuguese). Miranda, C.T., R.F. Pinto, D.V.N. de Lima, C.V.Viegas, S.M. da Costa and S.M.F.O. Azevedo. 2015. Microalgae Lipid and Biodiesel Production: A Brazilian Challenge. American Journal of Plant Sciences 6:2522-2533. Nunes, A.J.P. and I.P. Rocha. 2015. Overview and latest developments in shrimp and tilapia aquaculture in Northeast Brazil. World Aquaculture 46:10-17. OECD-FAO (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development-Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2014. Agricultural Outlook 2014-2023. http://www.fao. org/3/a-i3818e.pdf. Accessed in March 9th 2017. Palmer, R., A.N. Rombenso, A. De Araújo and L.A. Sampaio. 2015. Cobia: is it the next big thing? International Aquafeed 2015:36-42. Rama-Villar, A., V. Faya-Angueira, C. Moxica and M. ReyMéndez. 1997. Engorde de pulpo (Octopus vulgaris) en batea. Pages 245-250 In J. de Costa, E. Abellán, B. García, A. Ortega and S. Zamora, editors. VI Congreso Nacional de Acuicultura, Cartagena, Spain (in Spanish). Rebours, C., E. Marinho-Soriano, J.A. Zertuche-González, L. Hayashi, J.A. Vasquez, P. Kradolfer, G. Soriano, R. Ugarte, M.H. Abreu, I. Bay-Larsen, G. Hovelsrud, R. Rødven and D. Robledo. 2014. Seaweeds: an opportunity for wealth and sustainable livelihood for coastal communities. Journal of Applied Phycology 26:1939-1951. Reis, R.P., B. Castelar and A.A. Santos. 2017. Why is algaculture still incipient in Brazil? Journal of Applied Phycology 29: 663. DOI: 10.1007/s10811-016-0890-8
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjExNDY=